Clienteling Benchmarks by Industry 2025: SMS vs. Email Results

Reliable clienteling data hard to come by? Not anymore. We analyzed over 1000 retail locations to reveal the true power of personalized outreach.

SMS Clienteling Benchmarks

Written by

Robert Woo, Writer @ Endear

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Reliable clienteling data hard to come by? Not anymore. We analyzed over 1000 retail locations to reveal the true power of personalized outreach.

Clienteling is just another word for marketing, right?

Wrong.

It's not just that the definition of clienteling is different from traditional marketing methods, but moreover, it's the results that show the true difference.

We recently highlighted on our LinkedIn (yes, you should follow us there for additional metrics and insights) that Endear clients see 36X higher conversion rates than those brands that rely on traditional marketing platforms. This is because clienteling is less about one-size-fits-all emails that cast a wide net, and more of a personalized and tailored conversation that focuses on 1-on-1 communication.

And the proof is in the pudding.

In this post, you'll see our clienteling benchmarks for jewelry brands, what SMS clienteling looks like in practice, how 1:1 texts from store associates stack up against published mass SMS and email benchmarks, and how to measure (and beat) these numbers in your own stores. Let's start with what we actually measured.

Key takeaways:

  • Most SMS benchmarks measure broadcast campaigns. Clienteling benchmarks track 1:1 messages from store associates, so compare the two separately.
  • In Endear's jewelry benchmark, SMS clienteling converted at 11.94% versus 1.62% for email and earned $27.03 per message.
  • Email still had the higher average order value, so strong jewelry programs use texts to start conversations and email for high-ticket purchases.
  • Track reply rate over clicks. Jewelry associates got replies to 8.41% of texts and 0.42% of emails.
  • For a fair comparison, separate 1:1 outreach from campaigns, split results by channel and benchmark against your own sector.

What Are Clienteling Benchmarks?

Clienteling benchmarks are average performance figures for 1:1 messages sent by store associates to their own customers. They typically cover open rate, reply rate, conversion rate, revenue per message, and average order value, split by channel (SMS vs. email) and retail sector, so you can see how your outreach compares with your peers.

Why not just use your email platform's benchmarks? Because they measure something different. Mass marketing benchmarks track broadcast sends: one message, thousands of recipients. Clienteling benchmarks track conversations: one associate, one customer, one message written for that person. Comparing the two is a bit like comparing a billboard to a personal shopper. Both have a job, but you wouldn't grade them on the same curve.

Here are the metrics that matter most when you're measuring clienteling:

  • Open rate – The share of clienteling emails that get opened (SMS open rates are rarely tracked the same way).
  • Reply rate – The share of messages that get a response. This is the best signal that a conversation, not a broadcast, is happening.
  • Conversion rate – The share of messages that lead to a purchase.
  • Revenue per message – Attributed revenue divided by messages sent. It's the easiest way to show the value of associate time.
  • Average order value (AOV) – What the typical attributed order is worth.
Comparing the two is a bit like comparing a billboard to a personal shopper.

2025 Clienteling Benchmarks for Retail Sectors

The Endear team aggregated last year's data (the 2024 calendar year) across more than 1,000 retail stores across retail sectors such as Apparel, Beauty & Wellness, Home/Furnishing, Jewelry, and Accessories & Shoes. This gave us incredible insight into not only how our clients are using Endear to connect with their customers and foster loyalty through clienteling, but a year-end benchmark for each industry that can help all retailers measure their own marketing efforts against what clienteling is doing for their peers.

Jewelry Clienteling Benchmarks: SMS vs. Email

For example, take a look at our clienteling benchmark for Jewelry brands:

!Clienteling benchmarks for jewelry brands comparing SMS and email open rate, reply rate, conversion rate, revenue per message and average order value

Clienteling Benchmarks for Jewelry Brands

Jewelry Clienteling Benchmarks: SMS vs. Email

Metric

Email clienteling

SMS clienteling

Open rate

30.66%

Not reported

Reply rate

0.42%

8.41%

Conversion rate

1.62%

11.94%

Revenue per message

$6.45

$27.03

Average order value

$397.56

$226.29

Not only do we see that clienteling messages on both email and SMS are higher than in traditional marketing, but that SMS clienteling converts at more than 7X the rate of email clienteling (11.94% vs. 1.62%). Jewelry customers also replied to associate texts 20 times as often as they replied to associate emails, and each text brought in more than four times the revenue.

From our vantage point, we see how effective text messages are in creating an intimate and personalized experience between the customer and the sales associate; much like the white-glove experience that they would get from walking into a brick & mortar jewelry store.

We also know that the jewelry brands best at clienteling take every opportunity to craft messages around milestone moments like anniversaries and graduations, information that's easy to access within the clienteling CRM that they're messaging from. Again, the results of this level of clienteling speak for themselves.

One number worth a second look: email's average order value ($397.56) is higher than SMS's ($226.29). So email still has a role for considered, high-ticket purchases where the customer wants photos, specs and time to think. Texting is the channel that starts the conversation and gets the yes. Email is where the bigger basket often closes.

Knowing this, if you're a jewelry brand, which do you think you'll lean into more?

Clienteling Benchmarks for Jewelry Brands

Clienteling Benchmarks for Jewelry Brands

What Is SMS Clienteling?

SMS clienteling is 1:1 text messaging between a store associate and a customer they know, using that customer's purchase history, preferences and notes to send something personal. It could be a restock alert for their size, a reminder about an anniversary or a styled look. It isn't a broadcast blast: every text comes from a real person and invites a reply.

Here's what separates SMS clienteling from SMS marketing:

What Is SMS Clienteling?

SMS marketing (mass)

SMS clienteling (1:1)

Sender

The brand

A named store associate, from a brand-owned number

Audience

A segment or full list

One customer at a time

Content

Same message for everyone

Written for one customer, based on their history

Goal

Clicks and online sales

Replies, store visits, appointments and sales

Main success metric

Click-through rate

Reply rate and revenue per message

That difference in intent explains the gap in the numbers. A mass text asks for a click. A clienteling text starts a conversation, and conversations are where store associates do their best work.

One practical note: SMS clienteling works best when associates text from a platform the brand owns, not their personal phones. That keeps the conversation history (and the customer relationship) with your brand when an associate moves on, and it lets you track results. For the day-to-day how-to, see our guide to SMS best practices for engaging retail customers.

Write texts customers actually answer

Get the do's and don'ts of personalized SMS so every associate text sounds personal and invites a reply.

How Do Clienteling Benchmarks Compare With Mass SMS and Email Benchmarks?

If you're searching for SMS benchmarks by industry, most of what you'll find comes from marketing platforms measuring broadcast campaigns and automated flows. Those are useful numbers, and they show how differently 1:1 outreach performs.

How Do Clienteling Benchmarks Compare With Mass SMS and Email Benchmarks?

Benchmark

Source and dataset

Figure

SMS campaign conversion rate

Omnisend, 246M+ SMS campaign sends across 27,000+ brands in 2025

0.12%

SMS automation conversion rate

Omnisend, 20M+ SMS automation sends in 2025

0.78%

SMS campaign click-through rate

Omnisend

12.39%

Email campaign click-through rate

Omnisend

0.74%

SMS campaign conversion rate (25th–75th percentile)

Postscript, 17,000+ Shopify stores, January 1–December 15, 2025

0.12%–0.54%

SMS revenue per message, Luxury Goods & Jewelry (25th–90th percentile)

Postscript

$0.26–$3.26

Email clienteling conversion rate, jewelry

Endear 2025 Clienteling Benchmarks (2024 data)

1.62%

SMS clienteling conversion rate, jewelry

Endear 2025 Clienteling Benchmarks (2024 data)

11.94%

SMS clienteling revenue per message, jewelry

Endear 2025 Clienteling Benchmarks (2024 data)

$27.03

A quick word of caution before you screenshot this table for your next board meeting: these reports cover different years, different brands and different attribution rules, so treat the comparison as directional rather than exact. Even so, the pattern is hard to miss. Automated, triggered SMS converts better than broadcast SMS because it's timely. Clienteling SMS goes a step further because it's timely and personal and sent by someone the customer has actually met.

What is a good SMS click rate?

For mass SMS campaigns, Omnisend's 2025 data puts the average click-through rate at 12.39%, rising to 20.34% for automated messages. For clienteling, click rate matters less than reply rate, because many of the best associate texts don't contain a link at all ("Your ring is resized. Want to pop in Saturday?").

What is a good SMS response rate for clienteling?

In our jewelry benchmark, 8.41% of associate texts got a reply, compared with 0.42% of associate emails. If your SMS reply rate is well below your peers, look at the message before you look at the channel: generic copy, no question to answer, or texts that read like promos all suppress replies.

Clienteling SMS goes a step further because it's timely and personal and sent by someone the customer has actually met.

How to Measure Your Store's Clienteling Against These Benchmarks

Benchmarks are only useful if you're measuring the same things the same way. Here's a simple way to set up a fair comparison:

  1. Separate 1:1 outreach from campaigns. Don't mix associate messages with marketing blasts in the same report, or your clienteling numbers will look worse than they are (and your campaigns will look better).
  2. Split results by channel. Track SMS, email and WhatsApp separately. As the jewelry data shows, the same associate can get very different results on different channels.
  3. Track reply rate, not just clicks. Replies tell you whether associates are having conversations. Conversion and revenue follow.
  4. Set a consistent attribution window. Decide how long after a message a purchase counts, online or in-store, and keep it the same month to month.
  5. Calculate revenue per message by associate and by store. This shows you who your top performers are and what the rest of the team can learn from them.
  6. Compare against your sector, not the whole market. Jewelry, apparel and home goods customers buy on different cycles. Benchmark against brands that sell what you sell.

If pulling this together means stitching POS exports into a spreadsheet every month, you're not alone. Endear's Insights and analytics report on campaign effectiveness and associate performance, so you can see these metrics by store and by associate without the spreadsheet gymnastics.

How to Beat the Clienteling Benchmarks

Want your numbers at the top of the range rather than the middle? The brands that outperform tend to do a handful of things well:

  • Build outreach around milestone moments. Anniversaries, birthdays, graduations and past purchase dates give associates a genuine reason to reach out. You need that information captured in the clienteling CRM to use it.
  • Capture what customers tell you in-store. The best clienteling texts reference details from the last visit, like sizing, a gift someone was shopping for, or a style they loved. AI Notetaker lets associates capture those details by voice, typing or photo, and syncs them to the customer profile.
  • Tell associates who to contact each day. Most associates don't lack willingness. They lack a short list. The AI Opportunity Engine surfaces a daily queue of high-intent customers and drafts brand-aligned messages that associates review, edit and approve before sending. One specialty retailer using it earned $35 in attributed revenue for every $1 spent on actioned opportunities.
  • Invite customers back in. Link texts to appointments so a reply can become a booked, one-on-one visit.
  • Meet customers on their channel. SMS and email are the core, but WhatsApp is often the natural choice for international customers.

Curious what your own clienteling numbers could look like? Request a demo of Endear and we'll walk you through it with your store count and sector in mind.

Download the Full 2025 Clienteling Benchmark Report

This is just a teaser. For the full benchmark report, download Endear's 2025 Clienteling Benchmarks, including breakdowns for Apparel, Beauty & Wellness, Home/Furnishings, Jewelry, and Accessories & Shoes.

Looking for our latest data? Read The State of Clienteling 2026: Personal Outreach Is Retail's Highest-Converting Channel.

See how your stores could beat these benchmarks

Get a walkthrough of Endear built around your store count and sector, from 1:1 texting to associate reporting.

Clienteling Benchmarks FAQ

Is clienteling a word?

Yes. Clienteling is a retail term for using customer data to build ongoing 1:1 relationships between store associates and shoppers. It comes from "clientele," a business's regular customers. You might also hear it called personal shopping, assisted selling or relationship selling. Our clienteling definition guide covers it in depth.

What's the difference between clienteling and CRM?

A CRM stores customer data. Clienteling is what associates do with it: using purchase history, preferences and notes to reach out personally. A retail clienteling platform combines both, putting the retail CRM in associates' hands along with the tools to message customers.

Is SMS becoming obsolete for retail?

Not for clienteling. Rich messaging apps and WhatsApp are growing, but a text is still the most direct way for an associate to reach a customer they know. In Omnisend's 2025 data, SMS campaigns earned a 12.39% click-through rate, compared with 0.74% for email campaigns. For 1:1 outreach, the right move is to offer SMS alongside WhatsApp and email, not to drop it.

Which performs better for clienteling, SMS or email?

In our jewelry benchmark, SMS clienteling converted at 11.94% compared with 1.62% for email and earned $27.03 per message versus $6.45. Email still had the higher average order value, so the strongest programs use both.

Ready to Beat the Benchmarks?

Benchmarks tell you where your peers are. Clienteling is how you get ahead of them. When associates know who to contact, have the context to make it personal, and text from a platform your brand owns, those numbers stop being a stretch goal and start showing up in your weekly sales report.

If you're ready to beat these benchmarks by incorporating clienteling into your marketing and sales process, request a demo of Endear and contact us today.

This website uses cookies

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy